-
Wayspot Title: back to back dato gong
-
Location (lat/lon): 5.3292420, 100.4856120
-
City: Bukit Mertajam, Penang
-
Country: Malaysia
-
Screenshot of the Rejection Email :
-
-
Additional Information (if any):
The wayspot’s named “back to back dato gong” means it’s “back to back shrine” Which one shrine is located after another.
However, the mentioned object is no longer in the location and show different things in the existing Wayspot after the renovation of that area.
The previous Wayspot:
(Clearly seen there are two shrine back to back to each other as mentioned by the title)
The Current Wayspot:
(The existing area is massively renovated and both shrines are relocated and removed, only left one shrine in front of the shop which probably against the rule of “generic business”)
Please help to check through the eligibility and I could happily provide more evidence and proof if needed.
How is a shrine a generic business?
Both of these shrines should have been eligible when they were still there. Being that only one is left, I don’t know if this is just needing to be removed, or if you can rename it to being just one shrine and update any other info.
It’s not a generic business, since it’s a small shrine, it’s just in front of one, but that doesnt’s disqualify it. There are many eligible POIs that are either in or around a generic business; I know of art installations at generic businesses, such as murals or statues.
2 Likes
No. A generic business rejection should only based on the business itself(Grocery Store as a Wayspot, Car Dealership as a Wayspot)
A generic business, in my opinion, a BUSINESS that does not meet any of the three criteria like Socializing / Exploring / Exercising.
A wall art inside a restricted, a shrine in front of a store, a statue inside a store should be treated not as a generic business, but rather a work of art/a great place to explore.
I see. Thanks for clarification. 
I thought any item falls in the ground of generic business will classified under “Generic business” category
Agree on your point.
But in fact both shrines are removed and the shrine we see now is the newly built which you can see the appearance is entirely new and different.
I do worry editing its name won’t help much as the wayspot is formally approved mainly due to the feature of “back to back shrine”.
That’s why I intend to remove the previous Wayspot and nominate the standalone shrine as a new Wayspot to prevent confusion for future reviewing of Wayfarer.
Press the tool tip “i” button on Appropriate while doing reviewing, you will see the clarification in there.
Thanks for the info🙏
Feeling so ashamed not knowing this. This will surely improve the reviewing skills.
Thanks once again
@TrungLatias will be grateful if you have any idea on this
Thanks for the appeal, @Victor0427 We took another look at the Wayspot in question and decided that it does not meet our criteria for removal at this time.
