When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:
It was a poke gym used by all players around, a malicious player is reporting gyms just for “fun”
In the photo you can see the submitter shadow, its in the rejection criteria and maybe that what happened in that report, I don’t think a pokestop can still appear without a photo
Shadows are not rejection criteria, much less removal criteria.
I cannot identify the submitter from that shadow. I’m surprised you can!
Is the building that the mural is on a single family private residence?
Never said its a removel criteria, read my message, i said rejection criteria lol.
I said maybe a waypoint without a photo cannot be a pokestop
Desconozco a quien vive ahi, pero la pared fue cedida a una escuela para hacer el mural
y si eso fuese correcto mas de la mitad de los POI del mundo deberian ser eliminados, solo quedarian las plazas y las iglesias
Thanks for the appeal @Xavier We have taken another look but stand by our decision to retire this Wayspot.
bueno, es la decisión equivocada, y por eso esta muriendo el juego
de mi grupo del barrio eramos mas de 50 personas y ya solo quedan 3 que siguen jugando, los gyms quedan ocupados por varios días porque a nadie le interesa bajarlos mas que a los fly
y ahora hay una persona con 3 celulares y múltiples cuentas denunciando todos los portales y ustedes le validan (ayer me lo cruce, ya lo conozco, es un tipo de mas de 30 años con problemas)
pero bue, parece que pierden a otros dos jugadores mas , yo que juego 7 años diariamente
y mi señora que tiene su cuenta desde el día de lanzamiento
no vamos a seguir jugando donde no se considera nuestra opinión
a todo esto este señor gracias a sus multi cuentas ya borro mas de 10 portales de la zona
Actually, as @MegaTrainerRed says, murals being incorrectly accepted on the sides of private residences is not the norm. There are several places in Central and Southern America where it seems like they do get mistakenly approved, but outside of that, it’s a fairly uncommon sight in other countries.
This isn’t anything to do with opinions. The rules very clearly state that wayspots on single family private residences aren’t allowed, and that this includes the outward facing property boundary for those properties. I understand that it can be disheartening for wayspots to get removed, but in this case it was quite clearly against the rules for this wayspot to exist.
se se, ya entendi eso
y la otra cuestion?
como es que un jugador con multiples cuentas sigue jugando?
eso acaso no esta tmb en sus “reglas”?
hagan lo que quieran, como siempre, solo los fly y los multicuentas van a quedar
