SUGGESTION - A streamlined way to replace POI

As many of us know, Niantic has decided that trying to update a POI through editing the information is now considered abuse, and many users are being flagged for well intentioned edits.

Sometimes it is a piece of art that is replaced, or a business that closes and reopens as something new, and oftentimes these new things are still eligible in their own right.

Niantic wants us to instead report the old POI for deletion and resubmit the new one, to clear old data and to try and curb abuse where a person nominates an old, eligible thing into a new, ineligible thing, but I believe this decision was also made without consideration for the chaos this can cause in-game.

The Impact of the Current Decision:

I can only speak for pokemon go, but for example, when a stop is removed, as Cyndiepooh has pointed out, showcases are affected, as well as routes and many other aspects of gameplay.

By the time the new POI is approved and reinstated, the local players have lost a key part of their game, and the reintroduction of the new stop does not fix that. Likewise, if a gym is removed, a new gym may be promoted, but it will not be the same one- a location is chosen seemingly at random to become a gym. This often causes the new gym to be less accessible, and if players were working on progress, such as a gold medal, this data is lost forever. *This passage has been edited since I posted. Scroll to the bottom to see what changed.

It is this shuffling that players try to avoid when editing a POI, and it cannot be considered a nonissue as it affects us directly. If similar issues occur in other niantic games I’d love to hear it.

My Solution:

Each game should have its own option to replace a POI in addition to its other reporting and editing options when tapping on it. In Pokemon Go, for instance, the screen looks like this, and a Replace Pokestop button could easily fit here, or under the Report Issue flow.

The way this would work is simple. A replacement would be treated more like a nomination than a single edit. The player would have to write down the new information as if they were nominating a fresh POI, and it would be subject to the same eligibility and reviewing requirements as any other, including reporting the change as abusive if players believe it was done to manipulate the game.

Voters and Niantic’s team would be able to see and compare the old POI with the new one, similar to the single edits we can already vote on.
This would ensure that people couldn’t simply edit an eligible POI into something ineligible by leaving out details. All the information would be in one place.

What would happen next? If it is approved all previous information would be replaced wholesale at Niantic’s discretion, including such things as scans, which would likely be deleted, and the new information would occupy the same spot. In-game records like your badge progress, its status as a Raid Gym, routes, and showcases would ideally remain in place.

If it is ineligible and rejected, the old POI would persist as is, unless of course someone feels like seperately reporting it for no longer existing with the usual option for doing so.

What I am suggesting would accomplish exactly what Niantic is trying to do now- make sure POI are completely up to date, but without reshuffling and affecting gameplay for its users.

We all want an accurate, up to date map full of interesting things to interact with and explore, but not at the expense of our gameplay, and certainly not at the expense of our records for just trying to help.

Thank you for reading!

    • Edited. I had previously stated that gyms can be demoted if a neighboring stop is removed. I have received multiple replies to the contrary, as well as more information, and have updated and credited input appropriately.
9 Likes

This statement is not true.

4 Likes

It depends how many PokéStops/gyms are in the cell. If there’s 2, 6, or 20 and one gets removed, then yes, a gym will be demoted.

1 Like

No. If the gym is not moved, it stays a gym, even if the count no longer supports that.

If a gym is moved into a different L14, it can get demoted, depending on the count there.

For a long time we had two gyms in an L14 with no pokestops.

4 Likes

I have brought up a similar complaint. Not repurposing Wayspots is not a new thing, but the games I play depend more and more on Wayspots being permanent. The Wayfarer team needs to address this with the game teams. Overclock on particular portals in Ingress. So many things in PoGo: gyms, gold gyms, elite gyms, showcase stops, route start and end points…seems like I am missing something. If there is any way they can conceive of that we can petition for updating of a Wayspot instead of removal, I would be thrilled. But if the petition could result in removal, I probably wouldn’t use it.

As it is, I am simply not reporting any more irl changes. I will still report Wayspots that should never have been accepted, like at schools or emergency services. Or ones that become something like that and should be removed for safety concerns.

6 Likes

Having just had this recently, where a stop was removed in a cell that just got a gym, i can confirm that the gym stayed. It maybe used to do that, but it doesnt now

1 Like

I also agree with this. Theres 3 murals in glasgow that were cha hed a couple of years back (to be clear, tbe murals before were rhere for several years). I tried to update to the new murals, as they were all acceptable (they were murals after all), woth new photos, new decriptions etc. All were rejected as google maps still showed the old murals. They obviosuly wouldnt have been removed as again, google maps still shows they are rhere, and even if tjey had, in the middle of glasgow at the time it would have taken months to pass. So i left them. This system suggested would have been a much better option (especially woth suppoeting photos and info)

1 Like

Agreed. With the system existing as is, it makes me not want to contribute to the map, and encourages me to leave outdated POI as they are.

As a data collection company, this is exactly what Niantic doesn’t want, but as a player I have no incentive to update things the way it stands now.

Also with yours and other input I have changed the passage about gym demotion. I hope it’s okay that I included your input with credit in the post. If not I can reword it.

3 Likes

This is a public forum - no worries about sharing content from here. I wish I had more evidence to give. Be aware that Niantic can change this if they wish to, but this is how it currently is behaving. Plus there have been glitches with moved gyms not demoting right away when moved into a different L14 where there aren’t enough stops, but they usually do reset eventually. Several people have posted here surprised when ones do reset since they had only seen the glitch earlier.

1 Like

I’m going to move this to General Discussion area as the forum category is meant to be about the forum, and to give this higher visibility.

2 Likes

Thank you, i waffled on the category quite a bit due to the wording so I appreciate the move and clarification!

1 Like

I think this is an important topic worth sharing thoughts on.

There ia a huge amount of variation of circumstances/contributing factors. But one way or another the bottom line for me is that the current arrangements are ad hoc at best and Byzantine at worst.

The lack of clarity also works against keeping the database as up to date as it should be, and creates a sense of frustration in Wayfinders.

The term Repurposing seemed to me to suddenly emerge and my reaction as a wayfinder is to feel threatened. So let’s talk about the R word :sunglasses:

Everyday the database gets older. It holds the information in stasis while the world around is dynamic.

The global network of Wayfinders provides a way for people to update that data.
We have the ability to edit the whole data associated with the object. There is no warning in that editing proposing process (at least in Ingress) that you might be about to do something wrong, nothing about the R word.

Currently there is a lack of common sense in what you might do. The impact on games can’t be ignored in my opinion. The database exists and a key purpose is to provide data to be used by the games if in updating that information, it causes game play issues that can’t be ignored in my opinion. The playability in an area could be significantly impacted and damage the community. It is a consideration in helping the process be smooth.

I suspect the suggestion in the original post is too complex to implement quickly or easily as it would require changes in each game.
I suspect some sort of appeals process to allow assessment of the whole might work but I have no idea of the volume.
Direct oversight by staff may help sift out any truly malicious attempts as I think the majority are genuine attempts to update the database with the least disruption.
I’ll stop there for now. But I would be interested in hearing a range of thoughts and scenarios.

7 Likes

Hi @heterodont

Thank you for sharing this interesting thought :hugs:

To give you my feedback I tried to imagin how this would be in reality. (Pogo view, sorry ingressler I have no clue about your triangle world):

Let us take english pub, common case.

Person 1 is only pogo player. Cares zero about the map → would never use that

Person 2 is meanly pogo player, but cares a bit. This person would recognize that there’s is a new pub inside (to be sure go in for beer or two), open the pogo menue and find your suggested button. The person open it and find a lot of stuff to do. → at this point would break the amount of people who would make the rest - let us say 50:50?

Person 3 is a fellow wayfinder. —> even in this community you would not find 100% of people who would do that (for different reasons).

My fazit after reality-check:
I don’t think that the benefit (for niantic) fits to the necessary invest. Plus theire own decision was to prefer deleting the data

1 Like

Oh, didn’t know that.

1 Like

In Ingress you collect keys to portals you wish to field (make triangles). If a portal is deleted, its keys are deleted from your inventory. Hours of collecting are lost.

Also, many agents have a fielding plan that they do over and over for the AP points. (For example, the plan might create 50 fields in a single park or town square.) If a portal on that plan mores or is removed, it can mean the whole plan doesn’t work anymore (because links can’t cross).

From Niantic’s view, it’s about the scans. If they have scans for business X, and it is changed to business Y, they want to drop the old scans and get people to collect new ones. Even tho they’ll look pretty much the same because it’s the same building, and scans only get a sketchy outline to be enhanced by what the gamer’s phone sees while playing (weeks, months, or years later).
Also, they could just drop scans that are, say, over two years old. Or any that don’t match up with scans from the past six months.

2 Likes

Says who?

3 Likes

Sure, there’s a longstanding bug that if two people open the link carousel at the same time, and press link at the exact same time - they can throw crossing links. In the wild it doesn’t even happen one time in a hundred million.

It has nothing to do with the fact that moving portals hurts Ingress agents who spent a long time building a fielding plan for a specific set or portals at a specific place.

2 Likes

I think these are good points, as the user-friendliness needs to be considered. I have some counter points to this as well.

Person 1 would never use it if they only care about the map, which means they probably don’t do any of the other edits and nominations other players do, which in my mind removes them from the equation.

For person 2, As far as it being overwhelming- since my idea would follow the same format as regular nominations do when submitting, I would like to argue that it would not be more daunting or confusing than nominating a new stop already is. Since that interface is already extremely easy to use, I think one for replacements would be as well. If they cant use this they probably cant navigate a new pokestop either.

For person 3, I agree that most people are not going to use this feature, and I think that is fine, as most stops do not need to be replaced. Such a diligent wayfinder would likely open the options already to delete the old POI, but instead would find a new way to contribute and hopefully use it.

Thank you for weighing in.

To keep it short, my idea already uses the framework niantic established for edits and nomimations, so it shouldn’t, in theory, be hard for Niantic to impliment. And if players find it hard to use or wouldnt use it, they probably weren’t using the other options to begin with, but we still have those. I think that for those who would find it useful, it would be an asset.