Tourist park swimming pool “not accepted” by ML – “Wayfarer criteria”
Any thoughts? Hard to get a pic without people.
Cheers & thanks
Dear Dadcaesar,
Great exploring! Thank you for nominating a new Wayspot in your community. Your contributions help others discover all the unique, popular, and amazing locations around them.
Here’s what you’ve submitted:
Park Swimming Pool
Alex Beach Tourist Park swimming pool. Family friendly with shaded areas. Sun lounges provided.
Safe pedestrian access.
Your nomination will be reviewed by the Wayfarer community according to the Wayfarer Criteria. You’ll receive a notification email once the Wayfarer community has come to a collective decision.
You can also visit your Contribution Management page in Wayfarer to check the status of your contributions, edit the details of those still pending review, apply earned upgrades, or even withdraw a nomination. Note that submissions take approximately 30 minutes to sync with your management page.
Good luck!
The Wayfarer Team
Description
Alex Beach Tourist Park swimming pool. Family friendly with shaded areas. Sun lounges provided.
Location
Visit the Wayfarer Forum and join the conversation. WAYFARER FORUM
I have to confess that I am very confused. ML accepted eight resort pools I submitted on vacation last week. This might be a good one to appeal, but be aware you are limited to 2 appeals, each on a 20 day timer before you can use it again.
If you resubmit, I would use the title “Alex Beach Pool” since the nearby sign says “Alex Beach”. Maybe the Main photo could either show the entire pool OR focus on an entrance gate to the pool. Perhaps the ML thought this was a backyard pool from the photo?
Oh, and I don’t think this contributed to the “Wayfarer criteria” rejection, but I like to put something about why I think this meets criteria in the supporting section. Pools meet all three: exercise, exploration, and being social imo.
I have re submitted this one noting in the support notes that accomodation complex pools are now eligible.
In the meantime I have had another swimming pool not accepted with reason being private property. So … a lot of reviewers (including AI) may not be aware of the eligibility.
When reviewing I reckon I have positively reviewed at least 20 such pools. (thinking … what an easy agreement!) Most have mentioned Niantic new eligibility status in the supporting notes. Of course, I don’t know if they have been accepted or not.
Based on this experience…In future I too — will mention new status in the nom.
its hard to understand why the AI (ML) doesn’t know of the change and approve them. Not good customer service in my opinion.
Any thoughts? And how can reviewers be made aware of the eligibility change?
I have had three swimming pool submissions not accepted now. These are all part of accommodation complexes that have been deemed eligible for quite some time.
So it seems reviewers don’t know.
Why has the ML artificial intelligence not been set up to accept them automatically?