Dear Niantic,
I beg to disagree that this photo contains abuse, ridicule or harassment to a specific person or group. This photo is carefully selected, reviewed and evaluated by my group before uploading.
I/ we just submitting photos which i/we think fits for the criteria of Niantic Wayfarer.
I/We look carefully every details of our submission, the photo itself and the description.
Looking forward for proper and fair reviewing.
Thank you.
Welcome to the forums 
The “Abuse” rejection narrative can be flagged for a nomination for any of the following reasons
* The photo is not yours (e.g., taken from streetview, found on another website)
* The text itself is abusive
* The nomination is controversial and likely to be offensive (e.g., a mural of terrorists)
* Another nomination was abusive and all of yours have been flagged as a consequence
* The wayspot location pin is misplaced
* The wayspot is deliberately misrepresented (e..g., on school property but pretending it isn’t)
* (there may be others)
You may be able to tell which of these is the issue for this submission, but don’t worry about being accused of being discriminatory, as this isn’t what this narrative is necessarily saying.
you cant speak for a group. you are ONE person and not many persons that use one Account to submit. Its irrelevant. Just a sidenote.
Hi and welcome to the forums.
Any wayspot has to meet one or more of the following criteria:
I would say that an employment agency meets none of the criteria and is a generic business. As the email says, you should review the wayspot criteria to see what is and is not eligible - Niantic Wayfarer
I don’t see anywhere in the email that says it was rejected for abuse.
The decision email won’t say that. It will be on their contributions page as the reason. If they get a formal warning, then that email will explain the abuse.
