Unfair suspension and unprofessional support response

Hello,

I am writing this topic to express my frustration regarding the 30-day suspension on my account and the lack of professional handling of my appeal.

On April 22nd, I submitted a nomination for “Zespół Wodociągów Sądeckich” — a historical building over 100 years old, which is not only an important part of local heritage but also a vital piece of water infrastructure in the region. My submission was initially rejected with the absurd reasoning that the structure appeared “non-permanent,” despite being a solid, historic building.

Confident that my nomination met all the necessary criteria, I resubmitted it. However, instead of receiving a constructive response, I was penalized with a suspension for “Misplacement of Wayspot submission.”

Attached is a map where I clearly marked:

In yellow — the nominated building,

In red — the location where I took the photo,

In blue — the fence around the property.


The pin was placed correctly, near the building, on publicly accessible ground, in line with all rules. There is no requirement that the pin must be exactly at the center of the structure. In my opinion, this is similar to how a sports field is treated — the pin can be placed near the location of the object or area, but every case should be treated individually, considering the specific context. If the placement was an issue, the pin could have simply been adjusted, and some explanation would have been appreciated.

I have been an active contributor to the POI network for nearly 10 years, with over 100 accepted, carefully prepared nominations. I dedicate my free time voluntarily to enrich the community. Receiving an unfair suspension for a legitimate nomination feels like a slap in the face. If Niantic truly respects the work and passion of its contributors, I expect a fair and thorough review by a real person who understands the effort players put into building this world. I decided to appeal.

Here is the first response I received from support:

Hello Explorer,
Unfortunately, following a report and an internal investigation performed by our team, we have confirmed that you have been submitting Wayspot nominations that do not meet our criteria. As a result of this violation, your Wayfarer and Pokémon GO/Ingress accounts have been suspended for 30 days.
Here is an example of the violation mentioned above:
Title: Zespół Wodociągów Sądeckich
Context: The aforementioned Wayspot nomination does not meet our eligibility criteria, as it is placed away from the actual object it represents.
We recommend you review the Wayspot Criteria before submitting any more Wayspot nominations. Note that any further violations can lead to permanent suspension of your Wayfarer and Ingress/Pokémon GO accounts.
Best regards.

Unfortunately, this is another example of a generic response, without any real reference to my specific appeal. I responded to the received message, stating that such a response is a complete disrespect for the work of players.

Then, after following up, I received the following:

Hello again {name},
We're committed to our efforts against abuse in Wayfarer. I’m sorry to say we can’t offer any additional information related to this. You are welcome to return to Wayfarer and the game once your ban is lifted.

I am shocked by the lack of professionalism in these responses. It is utterly unacceptable to treat dedicated players in this way. Instead of a thorough review of the situation, we are met with vague and dismissive answers that fail to address the issue. This approach to players who have contributed for years is simply unprofessional.

Additionally, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation (similar to the one I’ve outlined here) along with an attachment to support my case. I invested considerable time and effort into this, and to receive such a dismissive response is even more disappointing. It makes the whole situation feel that much worse.

In my opinion, the current punishment system is nonsensical. If there must be consequences, they should be limited to Wayfarer and not extend to the entire game access. Frankly, it feels like it’s better to stay silent and not contribute at all than to risk losing a 9-year-old account over an unjustified suspension. The system, as it stands, punishes dedicated players rather than fostering a positive and constructive community.

I hope this message encourages a constructive discussion on how the system can be improved to better respect the contributions of dedicated players. I’m looking forward to hearing other thoughts on this matter.

5 Likes

Welcome to the forum @Dzeju555

For large nominations, the correct location for the pin is typically meant to be at the most logical point of discovery/ingress, though depending on what the large nomination is depends on which spot tends to be considered the best. For a building, this would typically be at the main entrance to the building. So it doesn’t need to be in the centre of the building as you said, but it should’ve been at the main entrance, which would be the door with all the columns surrounding it in your picture.

2 Likes

One can imagine pinning the Taj Mahal at the garden gate, or the Capitol Building at its most commonly used entrance.

Should somebody receive a thirty day ban for leaving the pin at the viewpoint rather than a particular architectural detail?

Shouldn’t these sorts of things result first in warnings and corrections from staff?

They aren’t even citing a rule, they’re just going straight from “does not meet eligibility requirements” to punishment!

Who is going to dare to submit anything in this sort of climate?

5 Likes

Well the rejection is valid. You should put the pin in the building entrance

But i leave the judgement about whether it should warrant ban or no to wayfarer team

You have option to appeal maybe u can get less warning.

Hello and welcome,

I would check Contribution Management to see where the pin was placed after submitting nominations, just in case there was some sort of GPS drift, or it was pinned at where you took the photos or the fence. While the pin can’t be moved after submission, the submission can be withdrawn and renominated, if need be.

Also, the abuse policy does note that any punishment can be assessed, depending on the abuse found and the severity:

As part of that commitment, we enforce a punishment ladder against most types of abuse. This policy may provide offenders with disciplinary actions proportional to the severity of the offenses they perform. This means that a first time offender can be punished with any of the disciplinary actions listed below depending on how severe their offense was.

At this point, there isn’t much any of us can do. Staff do monitor the forums, and may send you a DM with additional info, as warnings/bans are not discussed publicly, which the forums are.

1 Like

Similar happened to me,
I nominated piece of art, got warning for not good piece of art and after my appeal with explanation of art I got strong message that my account nominated fakes, nominated ugly nominations, I am bullying and harrasing and several other points - just message full of non true sentences…
I hope, that this approach of staff will change after finalizing the transaction with Scopely.

1 Like

You said you pinned it near the building. Why not on the building, or at an entrance?

What made you select the location you chose for the pin?

Did the nomination actually get pinned where you wanted it to? Or did it end up being pinned where you were when you submitted it by accident? Thats also a common issue aside from deliberate misplacement

I don’t know why people fail to read this email correctly all the time. The list they’ve sent you is a list of punishable examples, and not that you actually did all of those

2 Likes

I am very sorry, English is not my mother language but reading the following text for me looks like I am the bad bad boy. I can not translate it another way…
"
We have completed a thorough review of your account and have concluded that your account has violated Wayfarer criteria. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • low quality contributions (nominations, edits, etc)

  • fake contributions (nominations, edits, etc)

  • trying to influence reviewers to vote in a specific way

  • bullying and/or harassing others through contributions (nominations, edits, etc)

  • sharing personal identifiable information

  • Patterns of incorrect reviewing and/or participating in voting rings
    "

3 Likes

As automated enforcement increases, people become accustomed to accusation-by-email. Perhaps you are shown a traffic-camera image where radar data clocks you driving 72 in a 60 kph zone.

Recent Niantic emails say you have been found guilty of an infraction that is akin to a crime, rather than a civil liability. Possible examples include cannibalism, necromancy, name-calling, and testicular torture.

“I know I didn’t use Wayfarer to call anybody a bad name, so now I’m racking my brain trying to figure out who I ate!” sounds like a somewhat reasonable statement in this context.

1 Like

As in, “Examples of things that would classify as breaking the Wayfarer criteria include:”

Not “Examples of things you have done include:”

2 Likes

OP was directly and literally accused of submitting things that do not meet Niantic’s acceptance criteria. This, after first being told their nomination wasn’t permanent.

Does it not seem natural they would wish for clarification? They got a 30-day suspension from their game, as well as from Wayfarer, for contributing something that seemed like a valid point of interest.

What’s next? Punishment for grammar and spelling errors?

(Edited to correct typographical error.)

6 Likes

My reading of “We have concluded that your account violated criteria” is clearly - you are guilty. and the next sentence “this includes and is not limited to” I am reading as list of violation and not all of them my account did.
As I mentioned English is not my mother language so perhaps your reading is more weak.

End of language corner
:slight_smile:

1 Like

It is poorly worded in English.

1 Like

EDIT: Sorry about that — I thought your comment was directed at me.

I understand the intention behind your comment, but in this case, the message I received from Niantic was quite specific. It clearly states the reason for the action taken:

Hello Explorer,

Following a report and an internal investigation performed by our team, we have confirmed that the content you contributed on 4/26/25, 9:26:21 AM UTC is violating one or more policies. We have taken action against it.

Here is more information:

Content: Zespół Wodociągów Sądeckich
Policy Violated: Misplacement of wayspot submissions

We recommend you review our Player Guidelines and the Wayfarer Criteria before resuming your contributions to the Niantic Map. 

This is not just a general list of possible violations — the email explicitly identifies the nomination and the policy allegedly violated. So in this case, there’s no ambiguity: they are directly saying that this specific submission was the reason for the suspension.

What made you select the location you chose for the pin?

To be honest, it just felt natural at the time. I saw a closed gate with a small paved area in front of it that seemed like a perfect spot for the pin. I figured the entrance gate would be a reasonable choice.

In hindsight, I understand that my interpretation may not have been entirely correct. However, I don’t believe the reaction to it was justified — especially considering that, in-game, the difference is likely just a matter of a centimeter or two. It didn’t seem like a major issue.

P.S Sorry if my reply came off the wrong way — I’m still figuring out how replies and post quoting work on the forum.

4 Likes

That makes sense! I do think its a big reaction to what you did. Im sorry you got a suspension. Wayfarer is the easiest way to lose access to your game account. Niantic dont really take action on people who cheat in game very often but they get very serious about any mistakes and abuse on wayfarer. So that does mean we need to be super careful when submitting and reviewing to ensure we are doing things the way Niantic want us to.

I do agree their communication needs work. The tone, the use of seemingly cut and paste phrases, and the wording could all be improved

1 Like

Hi @Dzeju555
As noone here seems to understand why placing the pin of an object at the entrance gate leads to a suspension, I’ll try to tagg @NianticAaron in hope of some clearance. At least for the OP.
Good luck :four_leaf_clover:

2 Likes

Punishments are based on the points accrued on the abuse ladder. While some violations can lead to suspensions directly, in most cases the suspension is a result of more than one violation.

I have reached out to you in a DM. Please check that for further details.