@Gendgi I see what you’re getting at, but the suggestion is contradicting one of the most basic wayfarer criteria there is. This is zoned private residential by the city. I included the GIS parcel number to look it up for yourself.
Here’s a link to the criteria clarifications I am referring to:
This includes the outer facing facade, fence of these locations, and property boundaries.
I am not opposed to players being able to reach points of interest from their sofas, but this one is a Pokemon Gym. It’s presence here encourages players to pull their cars onto the curb to hit raids/capture the territory, which obstructs oncoming traffic around a corner where cars are moving at high speeds, or to loiter on private property, on foot, at a corner that cannot be visited (save for by the nearby residents) without walking across either a major highway offramp with low visibility, or a four lane road that is busy at all hours.
While I understand that you could state that it is technically ‘safe’, it is still on private residential property with a warning sign against visiting. The big red “No Trespassing” signs made this seem really obvious to me as an invalid location. People are not supposed to be stopping here.