Walkway ad park/waterbodys

Nomination Support
1

Please provide:

Screenshot_20240626-152007_Chrome
Screenshot_20240626-152007_Chrome1080Ă—2340 193 KB

Screenshot_20240626-151941_Chrome
Screenshot_20240626-151941_Chrome1080Ă—2340 137 KB

Screenshot_20240626-152603_Gmail
Screenshot_20240626-152603_Gmail1080Ă—2266 366 KB

  • A screenshot of your nomination, including rejection reasons if it has already been rejected
  • Include the title, description, both photos, and supplemental information
  • Copy and paste the title, description and supplemental so others can translate them
  • If you feel comfortable please share the location, as it is helpful (i.e. hidden duplicates), but you can mask it if you wish.

Why it dont meet the criteria?

2

This was rejected by the Machine Learning, before it even got to reviewers

It might be because the picture is from quite far back, with a lot of greenery and the bridge is quite small near the background. I would try to focus in more on the side of the bridge.

If youre going to resumbit, also review your typing as there are a couple of typos.

1 Like
3

Thanks! I will try and use translator app

4

Do people always submit in English there? Presumably it would be fine to submit in your own language

However the writing seemed fine, just looked like ordinary typos that could be corrected in wayfarer after youre home

1 Like
5

First time i did it in dutch second time english.
And yes was very fast dedcide not accepted, probally the ai decide it.

The picute need to contain more bridge probally i made some pictures of other bridges also i sall send some then you may decide

6

Yes a very fast decision coupled with an email that says “our team” means the AI took it

If the email says “the community” then it was reviewers

7

Hi! I have not reviewed the location or area but would suggest considering swapping the main and the supporting photos and anchoring the nomination around the footbridge/walkway structure instead as this wide shot around the park may be confusing for both ML and reviewers, and parks without signs are unfortunately notoriously difficult (if you do find a sign, definitely try anchoring around that).
I would definitely also encourage continuing to submit in your own language, there is no English requirement, especially not in the Netherlands.
For your supporting information, I would encourage using examples of how this meets the criteria (you already have a few), the fact that the children will love your wayspot is not very relevant and the park is likely for everyone to use so I would suggest removing this. In general I would strongly recommend removing all mentions of games and POI requests.
I hope this helps a little, I am pretty sure this nomination can work! Don’t hesitate to share a second version if you’d like further feedback.

2 Likes
8

20240626_150947
20240626_1509471440Ă—1312 316 KB

20240625_133741
20240625_1337411920Ă—3413 1.02 MB

20240625_133713
20240625_1337131920Ă—2279 1.05 MB

Screenshot_20240625-142402_Chrome
Screenshot_20240625-142402_Chrome1080Ă—2111 201 KB
here i have some more picture

Its a very small park whit no name no signs

9

If youre doing the bridge, maybe something more like this? I cropped it out, I think you want the bridge in the middle of the picture vertically, with only a little of the foreground/surroundings on thr main image.

1000014093
1000014093904Ă—850 163 KB

You can also have a go with the first image, but I think the bridge has more chance. Lack of signs mean reviewers want another “thing” as a placeholder ie bench, bridge