I restarted reviewing three weeks ago at great and looked at my starting point in percent. Than I do only 5 reviews in a row and wait for incoming agreements to keep them stable and increase it on long term. I never started for my next row of 5 before my self-giving goal is reached (I have the time ).
Maybe? I had wondered about that with what happened for me
But I think that you know a lot about reviewing and I would think you’d be making the right decisions, so I also wonder if its something else…
If most of the easy decisions are taken out of the reviewer pool, all that’s left is stuff that is harder to agree on, so then what will happen to agreements long term?
Yeah, I can controll these stats pretty easy, because my total is low enough.
My last experience from yesterday was, that I made my 5, it dropped and from than to now I got 4 incoming agreements. That’s 80% for that row (I know that was not for the exact same reviews).
Edit: after this report there was another incoming agreement and I did no further review. Makes 100% for my last row and my rating stays at good.
Not done may reviews as most of my nominations have been processed. I’ve become disinfranchised with reviewing as some of the nominations that I don’t think I would be best suited to doing them.
But please, how can it be, that 5 reviews decrease my rating and therefore incoming 5 agreements (really accepted or rejected or dups, not edit or something) don’t heal it?
Especially if that is true:
Reviews don’t impact your ratings, agreements and disagreements do. You might have received disagreements on reviews completed earlier. Please be patient and your ratings will improve as you get more agreements.
I hope so.
But really understandable is the whole thing not.
Even if reviewing doesn’t hurt the rating, in that moment where you do the reviews, your total increases (makes sense), so the gap between accepted+rejected+dups/total increases until more decision are incoming.
So imo doing reviews having secondary impact.