As creator, S2 have huge impact. I understand that from a reviewer standpoint It doesnt matter.
Indeed there is informational sign, and nature imformation and trailmarkers pointing into the woods, unfortunatly these spots are all within the S2 cell that has a pokestop with a statue.
Im not denying I try create a pokestop that will be a new spin in my local area, and this was the best I could do wo cheating anything.
I made apeal and tried explain my POW, and I will let it be with whatever desicion Nimatec decides.
made me laugh. Its both a pokestop and it isnt, untill you look at it. I made my apeal (didnt know about that actualy), and from there on it doesnt matter what I or anyone thinks about it. Its a go or a no-go.
I like binary. Either it is, or it isnt.
Unfortunately, the criteria isn’t always binary (hence why reviewing asks 
or IDK), but the coding may be a lot of 1s and 0s.
Its all about the bits and bytes
The sign to left is places in pogo next to the statue.
the 6 righmost spots are not pokestops, as they share a 200m cell by pure unluck and bad planning from those who places it there. Im SURE city planners would move the signs and statues a bit if they knew about pokemon ans S2 cells (joke)
I know they are approved spots, as dynamax power stops appear on these. These are beach volleyball, infosign and rules for wilderness, small boat «marina», trail marker
And to conclude this, regardless what we feel or not. Manual apeal aproved this spot. So i kinda feel my feelings was right all the time.
3 Likes
Thanks for update ……always good to know
1 Like
I hope all the conversation about proving it met criteria instead of trying to prove that it was a nature sign helped!
Hard to tell tbh. I was confused, and applied for judgment I hope all understand the humour involved.
In the end, my point of view ended as truth…
Everyone is ofc free to challenge this spot as not valid. You can go there, observe the sign, at the exact point, and say its not valid. I say it is.
this was denied it is a state sign on a public rd
Hello @chifen420
Did you want specific help with your nomination?
Happy to help if you did.
You have only posted the photo so far so my comments can only be based on that.
This appears to be a standard road warning sign. It is meant to alert car drivers to the hazard that deer may pose if they try to cross the road. It has in effect the same function as any other road sign. So this means it is not designed to aid exploration, exercise or socialisation.
So rejecting this appears to be correct.
Was there anything more in your nomination that would have turned this into something special?
Do you want to have assistance looking for nominations in that area?if you do then do tell us the approx area so we can try to help.
3 Likes
