Would these meet the requirements?

Located at Google Maps . It’s on the Public Right of Way. There are 2 of these signs on the PRoW, but not 100% sure if they are eligible.

Found a few of these as well on my travels.

This isn’t the best Public Footpath roundall, but I also saw this.

If these are not eligible, then all I see today as being was an opportunity to get some steps in.

The first one: absolutely.

The second one: don’t know. Might have to ask some Brits for that one. But it reminds me of these cycling trail markers we have here:

Which pretty much have “REMOVE ON SIGHT” status for some stupid reason.

The third one: I would assume markers like that one are solid submissions, but this one in particular has definitely seen better days.

The information sign is 50/50 for me… but will wait for more consensus. The national cycle route signs has a better chance of getting accepted, but I am not 100% sure.

I would be very interested to see if the cycling route sign is accepted since Niantic is actively removing all of the ones I posted a photo of in the Netherlands and Belgium. Would be weird if they’re fine in the UK but not elsewhere.

I can’t speak for the Netherlands as to why they are not eligible, my main concern with the ones I am submitting is they could be location / borough specific.

The first one is fine - gotta love an info board.

The second isnt NCN
I always have to check these local cycle signs some are good like NCN others are simply a recommended route in roads.
The last one is dodgy. Give all the PROW info and accept it could go either way

Thanks. Are we saying London Cycle Networks are not eligible? I am thinking of the TFL’s Cycleway network. The Council has info that shows this route and other routes in the Borough (https://www.harrow.gov.uk/road-maintenance-travel/cycling-harrow/2). I can’t find anything on the TFL’s website that shows this route, which is why I am uncertain.

I havent looked into this one in detail and would like other views. I don’t see them very often but do some digging when I do.
I have a similar one on hold from a different city as I have doubts.

I will test one of them and see if the Community accepts it or not.

I’d submit all 3 if these were in my area. I would look up where route 88 goes and describe it, see what happens. The little trail disc, similar, would talk about what you’d see while walking that route. The info sign is the strongest and easiest but I do not believe the other 2 are ineligible-I would say both are a good place to exercise

The public footpath marker isn’t a hard sell as it exists on a PROW (and has a directional sign within 100 metres as shown below). So the question is, whether it gets accepted or not.

Your signs are so much cleaner than ours :joy:

I can confirm that no elbow grease were harmed in the photographing of those signs.

1 sign accepted, 1 more to go. I admit that these signs are ones I was most worried about of all the signs I submitted.

Yay, well done :smiling_face_with_three_hearts: I love seeing those acceptance emails :smiling_cat_with_heart_eyes:

Here’s hoping this will get approved.

And the community have approved it

4 out of the 5 have been approved, with 1 more to go.

That’s brilliant :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

There’s a few that I didn’t submit, but requires to do a bit of walking to find them all…