Apele a la decisión de parte de Niantic, cuento entró en revisión se mostraba el logo de Niantic. mi propuesta es un mural creado por artistas urbanos y niños de una escuela, en las paredes de esta misma, ya que continuamente las vandalizaban.
El mural es reciente tiene alrededor de 6 meses de que lo crearon. Quizás mis fotos no son adecuadas, sin embargo, no creo que sea el caso. Abajo dejo las capturas mi propuesta.
According to the criteria, a mural is considered a valid location. This one was recently created by the local community. Therefore, I believe it is a great spot to explore.
Description
Mural created by children and local artists to beautify their school. It creatively represents science, mathematics, and physics. It inspires learning and art in the community.
Supplementary Information
This mural was created by students and local urban artists as part of a community effort to beautify their school and celebrate knowledge. Through colorful images related to natural sciences, mathematics, and physics, it promotes learning and creativity in an educational setting. It is located in a highly transited area, surrounded by schools and shops, making it a visible, accessible, and lively spot. It is an artistic expression that strengthens the bond between the community and knowledge, and also serves as a source of inspiration for those who pass by.
All you can do at this point is wait to hear back from the appeals team. There’s nothing that anyone can do in the forums for an appealed nomination still waiting for staff to review it.
De haber sido enviada a votación habría sido aprobada, hay muchos casos así. Pero bueno, hay más lugares en la zona que se pueden proponer y tomare en cuenta esto para futuras ocasiones.
No creo que eliminarlas todas sea la solución. La comunidad suele ser sensata al evaluar, y sin contexto, sería fácil cometer errores y borrar propuestas válidas que sí cumplen con los lineamientos.
Entiendo completamente que la regla sobre escuelas K-12 es clara y se debe respetar. Solo quería compartir que consideré que esta propuesta era válida porque el mural se encuentra en la calle posterior a la entrada de la escuela, no interfiere con el acceso ni con las actividades escolares, y está visible desde un espacio público. Además, fue un proyecto en el que participó la comunidad local, lo que lo hace significativo. Dicho esto, respeto que es un caso cerrado y acataré las normas establecidas por Niantic.
I don’t think they are arguing about the school ineligibility. I think they are saying that they don’t think all murals should be removed from game, or that they should be judged on their own merit. They may be unfamiliar with criteria, especially eligible/ineligible locations.
I’m thinking that ML most likely rejected this, as it saw that it was on the grounds of a school.
We say “primarily” because there are some institutions that function primarily as colleges or universities - places where you get education after finishing your main schooling. Some of those allow a few teens to start early or enroll at the same time they are finishing their “high school” education. But those teens make up a very small fraction of the student body. Their presence doesn’t make the college or university ineligible.
But a place where the majority is under 18 with maybe a handful of over 18 students would be ineligible.
You realize that would make places like Harvard, Duke, Cambridge, or NYU ineligible, right? Almost all universities take kids under 18 if they are smart enough to start young. Heck, I started college at a nationally ranked engineering school at 17.
You’d also have to reject all pubs in the UK, because children are allowed into pubs (even if they can’t drink alcohol) and can be served soft drinks/crisps etc.
Does this mean that a church that offers a creche service is also ineligible?
If it’s only educational institutions, what about universities that offer a creche service?
Those are services related to prek-12 in the same building. If you accept those as not breaking eligiibility, you need a dividing line between services that are acceptable and services that aren’t.
