Apelación de POI

[elijustrying]

I’m glad you asked that question.
The crucial difference is that there are private properties which have restricted access and Single Family Private Residential Property (SFPRP).
Those extra words are critical. SFPRP is not allowed as any game play may directly impact on someone home which would be very intrusive to that individual/ single family where they should expect privacy. This is why applying that rule is enforced as described in this clarification

Private Residences, Farmland & K-12

Single-family private residential properties (SFPRP), farms, and K-12 (schools or facilities primarily focused for persons under 18 years of age) are ineligible. This includes the outer facing facade, fence of these locations, and property boundaries. Objects in or upon apartment blocks, gated communities, or their shared spaces may be eligible assuming they otherwise meet criteria and are intended to be accessed by a community, even if not everyone. Communal spaces have the potential to be eli…

If it is a multi-family building such as an apartment block then the communal space is fine as that is shared. So in apartment complexes where there are shared facilities a play area that only a few can use is fine.
This principle then carries forward to more general privately owned property. If it’s not someone’s home and some people can access it even if the range of people is very limited then that is ok.
So although a space like a university is private, with restricted access it is fine as it is not someone’s home.

[SlimboyFat71]

Unfortunately, the criteria has to draw a line somewhere. They are not always perfect in the real world but we have to stick to those rules.

Example: A Historic “Blue Plaque” on SFPRP is not eligible but on a Town House converted to 4 flats it would be OK so instead of being intrusive to 1 family it is intrusive to 4 families .

Sometimes it is just easier to admit it is against criteria, move on and look for something else.