Hi I submitted this request for a wayspot in a dog areain my neighborhood and it was rejected with the reason “Wayfarer Criteria” by ML, terrible ML in my opinion, could you tell me which criteria I did not meet.
Thanks
The images I used are the following
You appeal rejections from your contributions page, not here. You get 2 appeals, each on a 20 day timer before you can use it again. If you aren’t showing the appeal button, you may not have one available currently and will have to wait. (I would have sworn I was in Wayspot Appeals when I wrote that. Sorry if I am losing it.)
Or you can try resubmitting with a new photo. Wayfarer criteria rejections that happen about 24 hours after submitting with an email from “our team” have usually been rejected by the ML (machine learning ai) model. (I know you know this, but put that there for others reading this post.) It could have been confused by the pavers and not properly detected the fencing. Personally I would try submitting again with some of the extra distracting stuff cropped out. Just cropping this photo to square might help. Something centered like this:
ok I’ll try to use this photo and we’ll see
Don’t copy what I did here since that would be low resolution. Use your original photo, or take a new one and crop that one 1:1.
I edited the photo as you suggested and it was rejected again? What am I doing wrong?
photo rejected
So I attach all the candidate’s photos wayspot, can you tell me which ones to use or modify the photos so I can reapply
So this was rejected again for “Wayfarer criteria”?
I think you cropped it a bit too much, and I am sorry if I wasn’t clear about that. You want the gate with the sign in the middle of the photo, and a little border around it for context.
I like cani5 best for the supporting as it makes clear this is an area to be social and not a roadway. I like cani3 best for the main photo. I would crop it a little to remove some of the bricks from below. Use the 1:1 crop on your phone if it has that, and don’t bring the sides in.
If the ML model still rejects it for Wayfarer criteria the next time, you may need to use an appeal.
Or maybe others have other suggestions.
Yes
ok
They rejected the request again, even though it met all the criteria. I honestly can’t figure out what’s wrong with their ML, it seems to have serious programming issues. And I’m not just saying that because this request was rejected, but because, evaluating on Wayfarer, I’ve seen really unacceptable things approved that the ML doesn’t even block before the voting phase.
I think you need to appeal.
That way if approved they can feed it back it to Emily ( nickname for the program) and their learning. Its frustrating but having tried various improvements it seems the best way to go.
I just made the appeal. Do you know how long they take to manage the practice a few days or weeks?.
I hope they are efficient at least in managing the practices since they only give you 2 possibilities of appeal and it is not a disappointment again.
Aggiorno che hanno accettato il mio wayspot perche era tutto corretto pero appunto ritengo che deve essere migliorato il sistema del ricorso soprattutto se è causato dalla loro ml almeno dovrebbero restituire il ricorso usato come compensazione dato che non si è fatto nessun errore, detto questo ringrazio tutti per i suggerimenti e per me potete chiudere questo topic
Glad it worked out in The end.
I think a lot tgat was discussed will be useful for people to think about in terms of presenting submissions.
