Assistance With Nomination

I was just looking to get a little assistance with this particular nomination as it has been rejected three times. I have provided the appeal notes below but in short, the notes states that there is already a live wayspot for these particular goals which is incorrect.

The goals that I am assuming they are referring to are across the road on the opposing oval which, yes, currently have a live Wayspot. This nomination is within a different Level 17 cell to the live Wayspot on the other oval yet it keeps getting rejected presumably for being a duplicate (I have only received notes for one appeal so far).

There are three ovals at this location at Sweeney Reserve located in Narre Warren/Berwick (it borders both suburbs) in Victoria, Australia, and I have had no problem getting both north and south goals approved for two of those three ovals. The north goals on this third oval have also been approved but the south goals keep getting rejected as a duplicate which is super frustrating because they aren’t a duplicate, nor does my nomination share a cell with a live Wayspot.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.



Hello,

I checked the area

I can see that for the other 2 ovals both sets of goals are in the database.
For a football or similar game the goals act as the anchor for the field. So each oval should only have one wayspot that represents that 1 place to play.
So the goals to the North as in my screenshot is the wayspot for that oval, so the submission of the other goal set is a duplicate.
In short on the other 2 ovals only 1 set of goals should have been approved.
So at this location in total there should be 3 wayspots that represent the 3 ovals.

2 Likes

That’s what I assumed when I first submitted them. I did two of the three ovals (because one had construction at the time) and did both north and south fully expecting for only one on each oval to be accepted. When they were both accepted (minus this one) I then went and did the third oval.