When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:
Wayspot Title: Little Free Library
Location (lat/lon): 43.056807, -87.998398
City: Wauwatosa, WI
Country: USA
Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):
Additional Information (if any): This is on SFPRP
This one is clearly on the homeownerโs side of the sidewalk, and beside the steps to their front door. How much more blatant can SFPRP be?
Thanks for the appeal @rawwrs , we ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ขฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ.ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ๐ฬถ stand by our decision to not retire the Wayspot in question.
Mod Edit
Hi,
I think having looked on streetview that this is 2 separate flats - a ground floor/basement and a first floor/ loft.
There are 2 separate entrance doors and it looks like separate numbers
The outside space does not seem to have any clear formal division between each flat, it appears to shared. ( in the U.K. typically the outside space would be clearly defined) This would mean the LFL is in a communal area.
I give up. This as an acceptable location makes zero sense.
Personally, IMO the problem is with the SFPRP ruling.
Using the UK as an example.
There are many old โTown Housesโ, large properties that where owned by the Wealthy. SFPRP so ineligible.
As the wealthy moved to more modern houses many of these where converted in to 4 flats. Exactly the same building but now acceptable.
People state that any waypoint on 1 of these is to be used by the residents but do they really think that others are not going to use them?
Any suggestions I have would also create problems so not sure what the answer is. I once stated that any residential building and grounds should be ineligible unless the POI was an obvious meeting area such as Play Park at a block of flats.
