While reviewing, I notice this person post a lot of good nominations but there is the phone photo watermark.
Is it possible to at least notify this person that their submission have a watermark? Seem like the person does not know it. Thank you a lot!
Coordination: 131 Hà Lầm, Hà Tu, Hạ Long, Quảng Ninh, Vietnam
I usually reject it on watermark. After rejection he should learn
I did yeah, unfortunealy this has happened for like 3-4 days? I always reject for watermark.
Seemly he does not know.
Am I reading this correctly it’s only been 3 or 4 days and a variety of wayspots not just the one being resubmitted?
They might have several different nominations in progress, and they might not have had a decision yet.
If that is the case they may not be aware of an issue.
Hopefully they will start to get rejections soon, and that fellow reviewers have also chosen the presence of a watermark to vote towards rejecting. This should then send an appropriate message.
Having said all that I think the way feedback is triggered and how it is worded could be improved.
You are reading correctly yeah. Probably hope they got rejection issue soon.
Yes i hope so.
It can feel very frustrating as a reviewer to see a repeated issue with submissions as we review. We then think they are not responding to the rejection message …… However in reality there is no way of knowing the timing of everything.
They will probably feel frustrated after having waited, their reasonable nomination gets rejected. Hopefully they will understand or ask questions and be in a position to resubmit.
Seems like another situation that could be dealt with by AI. It should be able to detect that the text is perfectly straight / uniform which you wouldn’t get when imaging text on a sign.
It could then stop the nomination and explain why.
I am aware that it does meet Rejection criteria but I don’t see it as “identifying” the submitter, if the photo states that it is taken with an iPhone that only identifies as about 50% of submissions. Maybe AI could blur it out?
It’s one of those that on a few I have reviewed and it’s a brilliant nomination and I feel bad that I have to reject because of this…
Hola hola, disculpa que me salga del tema, pero me inquieta ver qué tú mapa en Wayfarer cuenta con la superposición de las celdas, ¿Cómo puedo hacer eso? Me parece que es una mejorar súper útil, se que no es del tema y espero no te moleste y puedas darme algo de información al respecto. Gracias
it is on wayfarer.tools!
Just to let you know, we can’t post the direct link to Wayfarer Tools here in the forums, but you should be able to find them via a web search. There are several tools available that can be added to your web browser, not just the map overlay.
Technically we “can” say the name of the website like wayfarer.tools . I think Cyndie refer it yesterday.
Saying the name is different than posting the link. We can’t post the link, as they are unofficial tools.
Right, what we can’t link to is something like this GitLab link. Wayfarer.tools is fine.
For a different example,
Note: I edited this post after @NianticAtlas reached out via DM to explain that I had misunderstood previously, and said I could share the explanation. The issue is not about sharing links to “well-known, widely used, and standard platforms for sharing and collaborating on software development. The concern lies specifically with linking directly to or promoting third-party plugins or scripts.” Naming or screenshotting the tool has been allowed so far to avoid possible harm from someone searching and installing the wrong thing.
TY for straightening that out for me Atlas!
One can post wayfarer.tools here, but it won’t become a hyperlink and take you directly to the site, as that is the web address. So, one must either copy and paste wayfarer.tools into their address bar, or do a search for it.
@1sebas45 hope you’re able to find them!
