Was könnt ihr den sonst machen ? Hab ne Spielerin die jetzt wohl hier löschen lässt kann doch nicht sein das eine community ambassador Area so leicht zu zerstören geht?
Ich bin der Ca und setze mich grade für das sichere spielrn hier ein was ja im Intresse des programms liegt.
Zur anderen seite gibt es keine Ampeln oder ähnliches und einmal um denn See ist auch gegen den Sinn des Campsites.
Die Wayfarer Botschafter hier haben keine weiteren Möglichkeiten, wir sind auch nur normale User.
Der Status eines Datenbankeintrags (Wayspot) wird von den Spiele-Abteilungen bestimmt, nicht von Wayfarer. Deswegen kann dir hier auch keiner den Status der Wayspots ändern, hier geht nur, bleibt in der Datenbank oder fliegt raus.
Bei allem was PoGO Community Ambassador Sachen angeht inklusive Campsites, müsstest du dich an Ansprechpartner aus diesem Programm wenden.
The main thing that is not clear to me is whether or not “abstrakte kunst 1”, “abstrakte kunst 2” and “abstrakte kunst 3” exist at those locations.
Generally, when appealing a Wayspot removal, photographic evidence showing it still exists is required.
For others following along, these are the Wayspots removed:
-
“Abstrakte Kunst 1” at 51.569741, 7.063349
-
“Abstrakte Kunst 2” at 51.569953, 7.063980
-
“Abstrakte Kunst 3” at 51.569604, 7.064638
If any of the current Wayspots are not safe, they can be reported for removal. However, ‘not convenient’ is different to ‘not safe’.
From a wayfarer point of view, this is certainly not possible, in fact one could argue this can be considered manipulating the game board, and is as such considered abuse (resulting in warnings/bans).
But having said that, from a game perspective I actually would support it if a small number of people would be allowed to propose changes to the game board, to improve the game experience.
I would not mind if the Pokemon Go ambassadors would have the privilege to submit proposals for changes to the game board. But as far as I know, that is not possible at this moment.
Totally understand what you are suggesting but playing Devils Advocate what if the current location is someone’s route to work and this has just moved them all out of his reach…
This is why I prefer the “Random” nature of Gyms. It sometimes works better for me, sometimes worse but at least it is fair.
It does seem like the OP got “extras” for an event which stayed longer than they should so it seems that this is just a “return to the normal” and not a removal of what they should have had.
I do like the idea of “Campsites”, health issues permitting I am hoping to visit my first in a few weeks in the neighbouring city so I will be able to see for myself and the local town group is working towards getting the same status but (at the moment at least) IMO they should be temporary for events.
Good Luck OP.
Indeed this would be tricky, hence my suggestion to make this a privilege for ambassadors, assuming they are more likely not to abuse the system.
It’s not a case of Abusing the system its the fact that if any are moved even when it seems like it is for legitimate reasons the new location is not going to be better for everyone.
Thanks for the appeal, @ApophisVonErle. Due to insufficient evidence, we’re unable to restore the Wayspots in question. If you have additional evidence to share, like geotagged images or photosphere, please write back to us or submit a new appeal with the additional information, and we’ll take another look.