Not adhering criteria? Seriously?

It is a shutter art and therefore valid. How come can wayfarer team reject both nomination and appeal?

2 Likes

Oohh It took me a minute to realise but there are 2 shutters and the door righr? And the art makes it look like a house? Its so clever I almost missed it :sweat_smile: I wonder if thr appeal reviewers did too?

I do wonder why thry say its a normal mural, as if murals have to somehow be abnormal? :sweat_smile:

Can you share the whole nomination? Would like to see the full sized picture?

1 Like

Yea. It looks interesting. Anyway people make mistake and sometimes they need to be spoonfed all information

1 Like

I do wonder if the appeals team is also partly AI-based, I’ve seen a few rejections that don’t look like a human really reviewed them.

2 Likes

At a minimum the rejection text is boiler plate with a gap for the type of POI : “The object in question does not meet the Wayfarer criteria as it is a normal […], which has no significance.”. All the in-house reviewer has to do is click ‘not interesting’, provide a short label and the rejection is complete (or however the interface works for them).

I’m also amused by the idea of something being a “normal” mural.

1 Like