I didn’t see any specific reason in the email that said why it was rejected…
I get frustrated with this process bc I have nominated several historical buildings or landmarks that sit close by other Wayspots so I know the area is considered safe. Not sure if it is just the words that I am using in the title/description or lack of correct language that is getting me rejected?!
IMO, you’re not really selling it as a point of historical interest worthy of exploration at the moment. What makes this a place someone would go to see today, now that neither the feed store nor the museum are open?
The rejection email will say either “our team” or “the community” which gives you some initial hints about rejections. When you log into the wayfarer website, you might find reasons of varying helpfulness.
An abandoned building doesn’t meet any of the 3 acceptance criteria: a great place to socialize, explore, or exercise.
Looks like a dangerous place to hang out.
'It exists" and “people go by here” are not acceptance criteria.
I may be missing something here, but based on how the location is described, I would struggle to give this a positive vote. The location is closed, doesn’t encourage me to meet up with people and socialise at this location. Sorry, if this was an actual live museum, I might be persuaded to vote favouribly.
