Well, if I Drive around looking for invalid pokestops instead of driving around looking for potential places for additional Stops in Order to make the Game more fun for everyone…. I don‘t know what you would Call that…
Just looking at the map, you tell it like it’s empty but you have 15 occupied L17 cells (13 Stops / 2 Gyms) in the L14 Cell. For a residential area this is fantastic.
In my view the insect hotel is eligible. We have seen many examples here on this forum. I also think this is not SFPR, also the other properties in this street show a clear piece of land between the fence and the sidewalk.
That was a lot of work for me. I am doing all of This for my children who love Pokémon, my neighbors and the Kids that get Kicked out of downtown. I will Tell them all to stop trying. This Game is no fun when you have residence who appearently have no Life whatsoever being Players for over 10 years now. Now I see that the people who are in charge here are not interested in the Players to have Fun either. We will Look for a better Game then. Thanks! Don‘t worry about my requests.
The Kids have more to interact with in the game than most.
I disagree that “more stops = more fun”, it’s called Pokemon GO, exploring is part of the game.
Whether you decide to continue to play or not is down to you and only you. We have advised you on why certain waypoints will have been removed and because you did not get the reply you wanted you threaten to quit.
As stated above, I am not staff, I can do nothing about your requests, I can only advise on what I have learned whilst using wayfarer.
There is a definite line for the side walk with no overhang from the hedge. Are you saying that people should be walking on the soil between hedge and side walk?
It is my understanding that you should be able to safely reach the wayspot, so it is not necessary to stand there, but my point is that this piece of soil is still public land.
So the soil is public land, safe to reach, and as a result the location itself is not ineligible.
edit: you see the same piece of soil at the other buildings:
These info signs attached to street names are kind of like British post boxes in that the community accepts many but staff usually doesn’t. I am of the opinion that they should be treated similarly to memorial benches which are only valid if they’re of local significance and I would usually like it if there is more than 5 words of info.
That‘s probabaly it. I am unhappy that I didn‘t get the answers I wanted. I was just phantasising that I was frustrated about people Running around looking for reasons to get Stopps deleted. My bad! I am so sorry!thanks for your time though
Hello,
I understand the frustration you are having.
There are some things to consider.
If you believe and have evidence that there is maliciousness behind these removals then gather that together and use this form
The wayfarer team will take it seriously.
Simply because something was approved sometime ago does not make it immune from removal if it meets the removal criteria.
The team will only remove wayspots that they have received evidence that it meets removal criteria.
Do take some time to consider. If you can provide evidence of where the private property line is, then do submit that for consideration. Look carefully at all the pin positions to check for accuracy.
A good insect hotel is an eligible object whereas a bird box is not. You initially described it as a bird box but I think are now describing it as an insect hotel. This needs clarifying.
I can understand that having several removed will feel bad. But the wayfinders here are simply trying to guide you to address typical issues with appeals so you can anticipate and provide better evidence. You have got the option to think and find more evidence.
In the meantime it might be better to give you some space to consider.
