Can anyone help me decipher why this was rejected? I checked the criteria to make sure this was eligible and to my knowledge it is but cannot figure out why it was rejected. This is the 2nd time I tried this spot since the first try was not as descriptive.
This local gathering spot can hold around 30 people, with amenities such as grilling, horseshoes, a dog fecal waste bin, bench, trash can, and a game board that explains the rules and a place to keep score. This location has constant interactions since not only is it a recreational space but is placed in the entrance of a public space making it walked by nearly all day.
It is frustrating when you get a submission rejected and are left wondering why.
This shows that it was the auto decision programme that rejected - so not a human.
You have 2 options you can appeal once you you have one available ( they refresh every 15 days) or alter and resubmit. It may get rejected by the auto system again or may get through.
If you were to submit again I would make sure that the supplementary information also focusses on the object and not the wider use of the area.
Can it be seen ok on streetview?
I will submit an appeal and hope for the best. If that doesn’t work I will submit the horshoe pits like you suggested. For future submissions I will make sure that the information I supply directly focusses on the object.
It is the entrance to an RV park but it is public space so I don’t believe that should be the issue. Nor do I see people in the background that would warrant a deny.
