These tiles could be accepted for two reasons:
In my view the main reason why these should be accepted is that they are small pieces of art, the trail is just a nice to have additional benefit
Personally i like the art but since the tile are small , proving its location is another matter. If you are concerned about its removal later, u can try to appeal again but instead of trying to restore everything in one go as part of a trail, i suggest you go case by case as individual art.
Absolutly. Both directions were possible but you’ve to choose one, stick with it and give enough proof to the reviewers.
If you resubmit with a fresh photo, maybe think about a geo tagged supporting photo, you’ll still have to back up the nomination. So a link to the listed tiles and where and why they’ve been put there is still needed.
Oh sorry @pokemaster4u2 your avatar icon is so similar to Panjadraakj that I responded if it were you who resubmit.
Yes but the reason why they needed to be removed after 8 years? Under witch removal critiria, if those wayspots where totally fine for 8 years long.
I only submitted 3 poemtiles, 2 accepted, one in appeal. 3 poemtile rejected as i shared here.
Definitely no vandalisme, not unsafe, permanent since 2012.
Title: Poëzieroute Ridderkerk Erasmuspark
Description: gelukkig het kind dat ken spelen in weer en wind
Title : Elke rimpel een verhaal
Description:
Poezieroute Ridderkerk
I can add also add the tile number to it. D21 d27 every tile have its own number so you can start ad tile 1 go to 2 3 4 and so on
Its ad the bottum right next to year date.
Poem: gelukkig het kind dat ken spelen in weer in wind
English: happy is the child who can play in all weathers
Who made the poems and routes.
Here you can clearly see the tile on street view, so yes, I think you can prove the location, however if I’m not mistaken, the tile is just within the same cell as the church, so I guess it won’t show up in Pokemon Go as a gym/stop.
Many of these are wayspot, here there are 5.
Many also have only 1 plaque super small!
About scanning the ground or to small. Dont make any sense.
Please don’t start to bring other examples into that. It’s hard enough to stay focussed 
We need a link of proof.
And after that we’ll work on a good submission, strong text and so on. Ok?
Most where great powespot location! Since most powerspot are on unfavorable locations, and almost impossible to get 2 waypoints in same cell 
whit exception of shopping centers.
all these tiles will ad a wayspot or playable powerspot. Or a nice wayspot in different game
And i picked the one thats is easy to see as example.
It make the games only more playable whit fun wayspots to discover.
For everyone around those locations.
Its very hard to find anything but will this do?
As link of proof?
I don’t think so, sorry.
The later article talks about 2014 and the above about that one which were relocated (as well as the real life object) 2022.
I’ve tried to look up the ridderkerk.nl side and you can navigate to an archiv but I seem not allowed to follow it. So maybe you could try to find that archivated article?
I think now we’re at the point where the Niantic appeal reviewer stood and at the end rejected. (Assumption time by Alice)
Hello, im back. I have gotten a picture of the nominations, further information he wanted to keep to himself, but these were the tiles that he got accepted at first hand and then mass removed which he got a ban for.
All the tiles are the same, but on different locations, far apart. It were 25 tiles in total and all got accepted and then mass removed 1 year ago.
I can clearly see several of them on streetview. So proofing they exist should not be difficult, you will need to make a good new picture of the tile, to proof it is unique, and I would write the text of the poem in the supporting information.
I don’t know if removed wayspots will show up as potential doubles, that might complicate things.
I agree with the suggestion, just to try, otherwise you can be sure nothing wil happen
Its ad least a cool nice tile! Here we only have no smoking zone tiles ad playgrounds
Also ad every playground the same one
Ad least not a self made mozaïek tile 
Think a translating error,assumption time over? 
Here is old screenshot from a tile 2014
In 2022 they are all replaced whit a fresh new tile. Renewed. Also whit numbers on it so easier to follow, not relocated to different location,
Due to 8 years outside in the weather they ended up looking like this one below.
And here example where you can see it ad same location.
If they relocated them the route wont work and the poems wont work since they refer to that specific location always.
But it make more sense if they accidentally translated it to relocated, instead of renewed
No no. I mean the article where was said that the bibliothek moved into the building of the city hall and the tile with
The physical existance isn’t the only problem. That this tile (one nomination) is something official and officially located there is to proof.
Thank you and your friend for providing this screenshot.
Looks really much identically but I think we’d need to look more on the details to understand it complete (or not).
Yes old libary was in front cityhall hall now its inside, cityhall, they also added the information so everyone can find the new location if the wanna follow the poezie art route. After so many years some building and places do changes, and they perfectly moved the tile to correct location.( for that specific tile the correct location should always be ad the libary) And update the route information.
( Old libary and cityhall is 20 seconds walk )
