Struggling to see why this was rejected

[cyndiepooh]

We have had plenty of examples of “just a patch of grass” not qualifying as a park. See this very similar example:

Blue Crest Hill waypoint removal was unwarranted

When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible: Wayspot Title: Blue Crest Hill Location (lat/lon): 48.212559/-114.354490 City: Kalispell Country: United States Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information): POI was accepted, then removed days later, no rejection email. Additional Information (if any): Blue Crest Hill point of interest was nominated following the nomination …

tldr version:

Blue Crest Hill waypoint removal was unwarranted

This is an open land which is ineligible; a natural feature/landscape. A natural feature when used as an attraction landmark/park/play area should have a sign representing it or amenities within the area.