Looking for a little help on a rejected nomination. It’s a weather vane located on top of a building inside of a park. The park is a POI, the playground next to the building is also a POI.
The building it’s self is prob not eligible which is why I wanted to nominate the Weather Vane. It really does stand out in the neighborhood, as it is the tallest point of interest for several blocks and highly visible.
Would love to know how you would improve the nomination. I’m trying to decide if I want to appeal or re-nominate.
I realize you know criteria and are trying to start a conversation here =)
A weather vane is often a mass produced object and we have been told to use that first reason to reject in that situation:
If your description has errors, I don’t see them. Could it be something about the location or a disconnect from the title? I don’t have enough information to have an opinion on that.
If this weather vane is by a artist, or has special significance in some other way, I don’t see it in your presentation.
It’s possible the rejection for the description being inaccurate (not necessarily about spelling mistakes) could be reviewers taking objection to the supporting information, as it is laying it on a little thick for what is a generic mass-produced item.
Admittedly, the weather vane is as functionally and visually useful as the clocks on top of buildings which seem to be automatically accepted by the community.
I would expect it to have been accepted.
