Good evening, I would like to know why I was marked that way, in my opinion and of other people of the same religion it does not seem offensive in any aspect, and I would just like to solve my doubt of why it was marked as offensive?, I just want to know to correct future mistakes and not offend anyone and thus improve in what I propose, I am not saying that I want them to accept the proposal. Another doubt is when it is considered something of private property, since it can be viewed from the public road without any interruption. I emphasize again it is not an appeal, I just want to inform myself a little more specifically to improve, thank you, nice evening. Attached photo
Note: I was sent this because of that “Generic crime of very low gravity”
Good day and welcome to the forum!
The nomination may have been reviewed and marked as abusive. It can happen for various reasons, some can be seen in the Rejection Criteria.
The following clarification has been made for things within single-family private residential properties:
It doesn’t matter whether it is viewable or interactable from a public location if the location it exists on is on the ineligible location.
This may be a warning email as seen from Wayfarer Abuse Enforcement Ladder Policy — Wayfarer Help Center
I have already read it and I feel that it is nothing specific what is shown in that section and it does not satisfy my doubt, since in my case I do not have any hate speech some offense and something else, since I am referring to a religion where in my community and in others nothing that I wrote would be considered offensive and feels that it was only marked that way because if, and since the answer is not specific and what is found in forums, I can not look for my “offensive” error to avoid it in the future, Thanks
And as for private property, if it is intended for a certain community, can it be rejected?, since it says there that it does not have to be for everyone but as long as it is accessible to a community although not for everyone, it can be eligible, but in the cultural context if it is intended for that, since religious community gather on that side to share experiences, to prayers, to novenas and other religious activities, which the qualifiers cannot know, because they are not part of it and even if it is put in such information and they still reject it?, And thanks for replying to me
El texto o la foto abusa, ridiculiza o acosa a una persona o grupo especĂfico
This specific text is what appears when the reviewer decision chooses “abuse” as their decision.
At first, the subject of your nomination seem like an altar for a residence. Can you confirm this? Do include the supporting photo and text as well as the location as it can be reference for the decision too.
As in the clarification, communal areas on apartments and gated suburbs are okay even if accessible only for certain people only. The key in deciding is if the location is SFPRP or not.
My initial thought is that this is an altar on a particular single family housing unit which makes it ineligible for its location. So the key context that is missing from your post is its location.
of course, I’m sending you the text in English, to help you a little
Title: Altar of the Sacred Heart and virgen of Guadalupe
Description: “Religious altar decorated with lights and figures of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Virgen of Guadalupe, symbol of faith and local devotion”.
Additional information: “Community space used for prayer and religious celebrations, especially on traditional dates which has lighting and a stool to pass, everything can be corroborated on Google street”
information about religion:
“The story of the Virgen of Guadalupe tells that she appeared on the Tepeyac Hill (Mexico) to the indigenous Juan Diego in 1531, asking him to build a temple and leaving her image miraculously stamped on his tilma (cactus fiber mantle), becoming a powerful symbol of faith, cultural unity and miscegenation between the indigenous and the Spanish”
“The Sacred Heart of Jesus is a Catholic devotion that symbolizes the divine and human love of Jesus Christ, represented by his physical, burning heart, crowned with thorns and pierced”.
For what it’s worth
Thanks for your help
that appeared when I uploaded it, that word goes before Guadalupe, you can search it on Google and it is part of the religious name and its history, it is not for offensive purpose and I think I already know why the report, but it is part of its history
https://maps.app.goo.gl/oHP3kJakMhF9kLCz7
This forum has a built in translator, you can use your preferred language. There is also the coordinates attached to the submission email that can better place where exactly this is pinned at.
There seems to be a lot of points for improvement in your nomination.
- The supporting photos do not include the object
- The object may be seen as temporary
- Judging from the walls in the main image, it does seem to be attached to SFPRP
- The flavor text explaining the object is best put in the description
- Utilize the supporting text to show where to look for, proof of permanence/location/etc., eligibility relevant to the three pillars of Wayfarer
No sabĂa lo del traductor, pero fue por las imágenes que traduci la informaciĂłn, gracias por tu ayuda, ya me dĂ cuenta de la palabra por la que me marcaron como ofensivo, aĂşn que en varios lugares ya hay wayspots con esa palabra, ya que es comĂşn en esa parte de la religiĂłn y pues es el nombre que siempre se le diĂł, crees que si apelo esa palabra por la advertencia, si me la acepten sin riesgo de un baneo?
I do not advise to appeal this for the same reasons as my previous comment.
Several churches can be found near this location that have stronger chances IMO.
Hello,
The issue that caused this warning is not the use of the word Virg in.
Is this the correct location?
If this is correct then the main issue is that properties around that point appear to be Single Family Private Residential Property - individual family homes. These places are not eligible. That includes part of the property that has been generously created as a point for the public to stop for a religious observance. Looking around that point I could not see a good match for this exact location. So you haven’t provided the reviewers with a way to verify that this exists at that location. That combination is why you got the warning.
From what I can determine I would strongly advise you to listen to that warning and not to resubmit.
If you can provide further evidence in this forum we can give further advice.
Pruebas de la ubicaciĂłn?
Hi
I asked if this is the location?
Have you photos of the shrine that show the shrine in relation to what can be seen on streetview please.
Hola, cómo recomendación procura que tu propuesta se vea en tu foto de referencia, no basta con enseñar solo la calle.
Esto es solo un ejemplo, no quiero verificar si es una buena propuesta o no, solo es para ejemplificar:
En mi comunidad existe esta pantalla de anuncios
Debo demostrar que es de acceso pĂşblico con una foto donde se vea los alrededores y mi propuesta:
No puedo enviar la foto solo de la calle porque realmente no demuestro si existe dĂłnde digo que existe, entonces podrĂa tomarse como un intento de engañar a los revisores y por lo que entiendo eso es motivo de rechazo.
Espero que te ayude mi ejemplo.