Niantic seems to have lost the plot entirely

Over the past few days, Niantic seems to have gone on a massive wayspot removal rampage throughout the Netherlands. Of course they’re operating with their usual accuracy and thus many wayspots have been falsely removed. In this topic, I will hopefully prove why they need to be restored.

First of all, let’s start with the most blatant case of Niantic screwing up: these following wayspots.







Believe it or not, but this is the SECOND time these wayspots have been falsely removed. I made a whole topic about it on the old forum which led to the wayspots getting restored. And yet somehow Niantic manages to drop the ball a second time and remove them again. Thankfully, using the Wayback Machine, I was able to recover my original topic, so here you go: https://web.archive.org/web/20240328180930/https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/52708/request-for-restoration-of-multiple-falsely-removed-pieces-of-wall-art#latest

Restore those wayspots.

Now, moving on to the mass removal of “graffiti” wayspots. For this part, I’ll be referring to Niantic’s own handy-dandy criteria clarifications: Unique Art

Let’s see what they say:



Clearly there is a big distinction between “vandalism” and proper art. The main criteria for acceptability seem to be:

  • a unique, singular style
  • an air of intentionality

All of the following wayspots are clearly the work of proper graffiti artists instead of single-digit IQ hooligans with spray cans spraying their initials on everything in sight.






These are all clearly the work of the same artist. They’re evidently the same style.




These ones are also clearly all the work of the same artist.



These two are also clearly done by the same artist.








And then here are some more myriad art pieces that are clearly far closer in nature to a proper work of art than a simple vandalistic graffiti tag.

And there’s some other types of wayspots being falsely removed.


This is a sign for a dog park. Dog parks are obviously excellent submissions, being great places to exercise with your dog and socialize with other dog owners. Yes, the sign is mass-produced, but it’s not about the sign but what it represents. I can’t exactly submit a photo of a grassy field for the dog park, now can I?


And this is a trail marker for a proper named walking trail. The only type of trail markers that seem to be acceptable any more these days. So I have no idea why this one was removed.

So yeah, I’m expecting these wayspots to be restored. And if Niantic could stop screwing up like this and stop overly harrassing their Dutch playerbase, that would be nice too.

i really wonder which additional database you use to provide such large reports with all links

Aren’t these located on the properties of private residences?

No, Aaron. Read the linked topic.

They’re not single-family PRP but multi-family PRP. So unless you’re going to move the goalposts all of a sudden and say wayspots aren’t allowed on ANY kind of PRP, there is zero reason for these to be removed.

Brief reminder of what the criteria clarifications say: Private Residences, Farmland & K-12

A prominent artistic display on the outside wall or in a shared space of an apartment or otherwise shared dwelling building, like the one pictured above, are eligible.

It’s literally right there in the rulebook.

We have received some additional information which contradicts the information we had. We will review the additional information and follow-up with an update.

1 Like

Sounds like you got some really bad information then, considering we’ve had this song and dance before about these exact wayspots.

Those do not look like art. They are graffitis and are essentially vandalism. Correct removal in my opinion.

I wasn’t aware there was a singular definition of what is and isn’t “art”.

But yes, I’m sure that my city (which has a comprehensive street art scene and encourages painting murals etc. on street furniture) considers this to be “vandalism”.

Feel free to educate yourself.

1 Like

Unfortunately, there cannot be rules made just for your city. Accomodate yourself while I educate myself. Deal?

Then I suggest you thoroughly read the ACTUAL rules instead of whatever warped interpretation you seem to have.



Thumbs up means good.

Some types of graffiti can be considered as art. Not all art belongs in a museum or a wall. Tags are not art. However, some great graffiti have been placed on property that it shouldn’t be on, and therefore won’t qualify.

Completely agree. The ones shared in the original post do not qualify as art in my opinion and that’s what I said. But, it’s not my call anyway.

1 Like

I have read it.

Mod Edit: Removed the unnecessary comment.

Then you’d know the rules don’t consider it vandalism unless some hooligan doodles all over what’s clearly meant to be a single solid artpiece.

Good thing all of these pieces are either on transformer boxes or multi-family PRP then. And the only one that can even remotely be considered a “tag” is this one:


Which is still a single massive piece and way more elaborate than what you’d normally consider a tag to be.

1 Like

I’m not going to comment on each and every graffiti that has been posted in this thread, as Niantic have already received the report and are investigating.

Vandalism doesn’t specifically have to do with the quality of the work, but rather whether or not the graffiti was authorized. There can be really high-quality street art that’s vandalism and should not be accepted. It’s on the submitter to demonstrate, if necessary, that the street art/grafitti is in fact something that was authorized to be where it is.
Most of the time it’s obvious, like large high quality murals on the side of business walls, but it isn’t always. It’s quite possible that you aren’t going to be able to make that argument. Then it comes down to a question of does it look like something that is authorized or not. It’s a hard call, but I bet most people err on the side of caution and consider something vandalism, unless it clearly looks like it was a sanctioned piece of art.

And we’re back to Banksy :sweat_smile: who afaik doesnt get permission first :sweat_smile: but everyones happy when his art shows up, and then usually someone steals it to sell or the council show up and remove it “for safekeeping”

Banksy is an exception. Can anyone name another street artist for whom the same would apply? :slightly_smiling_face:

The only bit in the criteria clarifications that even comes close to mentioning “authorization” is where it lists “most likely being commissioned” as a pro.

In the section after that, it lists a mural that is also clearly eligible without any mention of authorization or commission.

And Niantic’s view on vandalism is pretty clear too.


Vandalism = not an intentional work of art, a jumbled mess of names and styles. Nowhere does it say that vandalism = anything without authorization.

1 Like