It s the second time people reject a historic bar(It has now 112 years) in my city thats fully in the guidelines with the “It s not unique or historical”.
I know that if i made appeal it Would likely be accepted , but when people review stuff,Remember the guidelines
Kfc is almost 100years old. Does that make it eligible? No. U nd to put more evidence as why its unique. Simply saying its historic is not enough.
Anyway whoever reject your nomination probably is not here.you need to engage your local community because they are the one probably reviewing your nomination.
Good day and welcome!
Can we please see the full nomination?
While it would feel a perfect submission for the submitter, this may not come across in review. Generic/Non-Generic Businesses highlights evidence-based context to better convey the merits of the point of interest.
Of course! Here the description
Sorry for my english maybe i sound cocky in the post ,i just wanna know whether i amo missing something in doing nomination because other similar poi where accepted by niantic reviwers
Hi @gigiwdc
You can use which ever language you feel comfortable with here on the forum. There’s a translation tool included.
I highlight the importance of what content you add as the submitter can greatly change the decisions of reviewers.
While the description seems to follow the clarification, the supporting information is also part of the conveyance. The articles and reviews seems impressive for me, it may help to link the preferred review site in this supporting text. There may be also elements there that may have more improvements or tweaks.
That said, the main photo seems to be a large point for improvement. It seems to be a crop from a press article, see the shadows and elements very much exactly like the 2nd photo. I’d have rejected for using third-party photos if this is truly the case. Your own photo of the resto’s sign may act as the place marker for the POI (this restaurant).
Ok!thank you very much🙏🏻