When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:
I’m asking because I used upgrade on it because it got automatically rejected as a “Generic Business”. Then appeal got rejected because of an existing wayspot which was the restaurant itself even though the nomination is referring to the fishpond and it’s trail.
Hello
I am moving this to the nominate support section as this area is not for this type of appeal.
My bad. Thank you
That’s ok it’s not always obvious
Magandang gabi!
Wala akong makitang ebidensya ng trail or pag-gamit ng fish pond na ito bilang fishing spot para sa mga bisita ng restaurant. Maaring ito ay palaisdaan ng may-ari kung saan dito kinukuha ang lulutuing isda. Sa gayo’y di mai-rerekomendang sabihin na ito ay fishing spot dahil ito ay isang rearing pond lamang. Kung may maipapakitang halimbawa na nagpapakita sa pagiging fishing spot nito para sa bisita, maari yang ilagay sa supporting text para sure ang iyong mga reviewer.
Para sa “trail”, basahin ito
Makikita na ang sinasabing eligible na trail ay yung mga trail na may ngalang pantangi at para sa hiking/paglalakad na panlibang. Marami akong nakikitang “trail”-kuno na mga nomination na di naman talaga napapasok dito. Kung maari, ipamahagi rin sa mga kakilala niyo tungkol dito.
So, in short, it has to have directional signs for it to be considered and would be more so if it has some sort of informational sign saying that it is rather than some generic pond with a place you can walk on.
If you’re pitching the pond (sign) as a part of a trail/trail destination, you need to show evidence of the trail. If pitching as an activity area, show evidence that it is used for that activity.
Signs can help greatly as a visual marker. Most of the time, it should only be used to identify the true object/place that meets an eligibility criterion or more.
Got it.
