Why is this abuse?

Please provide:

  • A screenshot of your nomination, including rejection reasons if it has already been rejected
  • Include the title, description, both photos, and supplemental information
  • Copy and paste the title, description and supplemental so others can translate them
  • If you feel comfortable please share the location, as it is helpful (i.e. hidden duplicates), but you can mask it if you wish.

Can you tell us about this place? What is it? What is it used for? Can you share what you wrote about it?

1 Like

Welcome @FenixGhost23
A telecom tower is not something that would meet eligibility criteria.
It is not a great place to exercise, socialise or explore. It is a piece of utility equipment.
I wouldn’t consider submitting something not eligible as worth reporting. Was there anything else about your submission that may of triggered that in the text or location?


Thank you for letting me know. I live in a rural town that has like 800 to a 1000 people living there with not many interesting poi’s or structures. I will be more careful witb my submissions in the feature if I do find something else

1 Like

Although I think it is a little over the top, perhaps someone reported it as a fake nomination, given your description of it as a historic tower. It might be older, relative to some things, but historic is a description that requires some substantial evidence as to its importance.


Brah ek sukkel ook om dit reg te kry. Don’t Stress my dude dit vat tyd om te leer

1 Like

Baie dankie vir die positive respond bra :slight_smile:

1 Like