Hiii, first time here, I was wondering if some of you guys could help me understand why I was rejected. I fit all the criteria, I’ve be vigilant in the review process and if I had reviewed mine I would have passed it, and I’m stumped why it didn’t pass!
I appealed it, but the reason mine was rejected was bc the automation system reported that it didn’t meet wayfarer criteria. It’s a social spot, and a great place to run to. My neighbors and I love to go running there, since it is so pretty. We have ZERO pokestops anywhere nearby, and me and my neighbors have been living off of the +30 pokeballs from the daily adventure incense for years.
I was wondering if I didn’t have good keywords in my description? Thanks for any advice!
If I have found the correct place this does appear to be a rural place without many communal areas.
As above if you can find a clear anchor point for the creek the that could possibly work.
I am guessing that a lot of what you have to do you have to travel to it.
There are places nearby that you could make much better in terms of game play .
If this is near you ….
The park as a whole has a pokestop.
But there is a baseball pitch, basketball court, play area, and tennis court all of which should be straightforward submits. I have also marked the building with a Red Cross as I’m hoping it’s a club house?
The yellow cross is for the sheltered picnic/seating area.
If all 5 red crosses are added you would have 6 wayspots in separate cells which would mean 4 pokestops and 2 gyms. The yellow cross would have potential to be a power spot.
There is also a golf club nearby along with this information board.
It’s actually that a lot of natural places have no anchor, no reason for one location to be chosen over another location, making the location not distinct by definition.
If you have a lovely creek with a path running alongside it, how can one spot be better than another? If the answer is “because it has an X”, then that is probably your anchor.
